The app allows users without any computer science background to speak of or any particularly redeeming skills or charm, I assume to create AI-assisted fake porn from the comfort of their own homes. The fact that the children were originally clothed for the original pics was seen as irrelevant. Her hair's not perfect, and there are a few other elements which make it look "not quite right", but it's pretty damned good. As more and more people try their hand at creating fake porn the technology will continue to advance. By New Hampshire v. However, even if I disapprove of it, there's not a damn thing I can do about it- because unless I'm mistaken , it's not illegal for Mr. Now I have wasted a full minute of my life that I'll never get back watching that crap.
I can't see it. Our top stories delivered to your inbox weekly. The majority opinion, skillfully written by Justice Anthony Kennedy, leaves in place plenty of federal law to punish those who produce and sell obscene materials involving images of children. So no need to learn any photoshop trick. It's a non-issue. Is it a psychosexual disorder or something else entirely? I thought the point of anti-child porn laws was to protect children from being put in sexual situations when they haven't reached a level of maturity yet to decide if that's what they really want to do.
